4.6 Review

MHC class I-related molecule, MR1, and mucosal-associated invariant T cells

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 272, 期 1, 页码 120-138

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12423

关键词

MR1; MAIT cells; riboflavin; bacterial infection

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. Institut Curie
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  4. ARSEP (Association de la recherche sur la sclerose en plaque)
  5. Equipe labellisee de la Ligue Contre le Cancer
  6. Fondation de la Recherche Medicale
  7. ANR Agence nationale de la recherche
  8. H2020 European union Marie Curie Fellowship
  9. ANR (Labex DCBIOL)
  10. Institut National du Cancer
  11. Ligue Contre le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The MHC-related 1, MR1, molecule presents a new class of microbial antigens (derivatives of the riboflavin [Vitamin B2] biosynthesis pathway) to mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells. This raises many questions regarding antigens loading and intracellular trafficking of the MR1/ligand complexes. The MR1/MAIT field is also important because MAIT cells are very abundant in humans and their frequency is modified in many infectious and non-infectious diseases. Both MR1 and the invariant TCRa chain expressed by MAIT cells are strikingly conserved among species, indicating important functions. Riboflavin is synthesized by plants and most bacteria and yeasts but not animals, and its precursor derivatives activating MAIT cells are short-lived unless bound to MR1. The recognition of MR1 loaded with these compounds is therefore an exquisite manner to detect invasive bacteria. Herein, we provide an historical perspective of the field before describing the main characteristics of MR1, its ligands, and the few available data regarding its cellular biology. We then summarize the current knowledge of MAIT cell differentiation and discuss the definition of MAIT cells in comparison to related subsets. Finally, we describe the phenotype and effector activities of MAIT cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据