4.6 Article

Temperature dependent carrier transport in few-layered MoS2: from hopping to band transport

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac507f

关键词

MoS2; carrier transport; resonant tunnelling; hopping transport; band transport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the carrier transport mechanisms in chemical vapor deposited few-layer MoS2 at different temperatures using a two-terminal device configuration. The results reveal a transition in transport behavior from resonant tunneling to hopping, and eventually to band transport as the temperature increases. These findings are significant for understanding the material properties of future 2D semiconductor devices.
Understanding the carrier transport mechanisms is critical for electronic devices based on 2D semiconductors. Here, using a two-terminal device configuration, we show that the carrier transport behaviours in chemical vapour deposited few-layer MoS2 transition from resonant tunnelling to hopping, and eventually to band transport as the temperature increases from 5 K to 370 K. Specifically, the transport in the channel is dominated by resonant tunnelling when T < 30 K is reflected in the temperature-independent conductance. At 50 K < T < 110 K, the channel conductance exhibits a dependence of exp(T (1/2)), a signature of Efros-Shklovskii type variable range hopping (VRH). At 110 K < T < 160 K, carrier transport behaves in a transition region with potential attribution to Mott-type VRH. At 160 K < T < 210 K, the nearest neighbour hopping mechanism is confirmed by the linear dependence from the resistance curve derivative analysis. For VRH, the localization length, hopping distance and energy, Coulomb gap energy and density of states are extracted. At T > 210 K, the carrier transport is dominated by thermally activated band transport based on AC conductance and mobility analysis. These findings are significant for revealing the material properties for future 2D semiconductor device applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据