4.6 Review

Manipulation of the glycan-specific natural antibody repertoire for immunotherapy

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 270, 期 1, 页码 32-50

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12397

关键词

natural antibody; innate-like B lymphocyte; B-1 B cell; repertoire development; glycan neodeterminant; clonotype

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI14782-37, AI100005-03]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  3. American Asthma Foundation
  4. [F31AI120500]
  5. [T32A1007051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural immunoglobulin derived from innate-like B lymphocytes plays important roles in the suppression of inflammatory responses and represents a promising therapeutic target in a growing number of allergic and autoimmune diseases. These antibodies are commonly autoreactive and incorporate evolutionarily conserved specificities, including certain glycan-specific antibodies. Despite this conservation, exposure to bacterial polysaccharides during innate-like B lymphocyte development, through either natural exposure or immunization, induces significant changes in clonal representation within the glycan-reactive B cell pool. Glycan-reactive natural antibodies (NAbs) have been reported to play protective and pathogenic roles in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. An understanding of the composition and functions of a healthy glycan-reactive NAb repertoire is therefore paramount. A more thorough understanding of NAb repertoire development holds promise for the design of both biological diagnostics and therapies. In this article, we review the development and functions of NAbs and examine three glycan specificities, represented in the innate-like B cell pool, to illustrate the complex roles environmental antigens play in NAb repertoire development. We also discuss the implications of increased clonal plasticity of the innate-like B cell repertoire during neonatal and perinatal periods, and the prospect of targeting B cell development with interventional therapies and correct defects in this important arm of the adaptive immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据