4.2 Article

Local and Systemic Profiles of Inflammatory Cytokines in Carrageenan-induced Paw Inflammation in Rats

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 274-283

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08820139.2016.1248562

关键词

Array; carrageenan; CINC; cytokine; inflammation; paw edema

资金

  1. SRM University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Carrageenan (CA)-induced edema has been described as highly reproducible model of acute inflammation. However, little is known about the cytokines attributed to the CA-induced inflammation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the local and systemic expression profiles of various inflammatory cytokines following the subplantar injection of CA in rats.Methodology: Acute inflammation was induced in male Wistar rats by subplantar injection of CA. Serum and paw tissue were examined for the level of 19 specific inflammatory cytokines using antibody array. Further, the CA-elicited level of key inflammatory cytokines, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC)-2, CINC-3, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-, were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Results: Edema was peaked 3 h postinjection of CA in hind paw. Among 19 specific cytokines profiled using antibody array, CA significantly (p < 0.05) elicited the levels of CINC-2, CINC-3, IL-1, IL-6, -NGF, TNF-, and VEGF in paw tissue and that of CINC-2 and CINC-3 in serum. Consistently, levels of CINC-2, CINC-3, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF- in tissue and CINC-2 and CINC-3 in serum were upregulated in CA-treated rats when compared to control, quantified by ELISA.Conclusions: This study corroborates the distinct pattern of inflammatory cytokines involved during CA-induced acute inflammation. Furthermore, data provide new evidence on elevated expression of rat CXC chemokines: CINC-2 and CINC-3 at the site of inflammation as well as their significant reflection in the circulation, thereby suggesting their frontline role in CA-induced acute inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据