4.8 Article

Oxygen Evolution and Reduction on Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 58-65

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03431

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1945 139, NSF 17-537]
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725, AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic screening of over 200 two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides was conducted using first-principles simulations and continuum embedding models, resulting in the identification of promising candidates with low overpotentials and high stability under acidic conditions.
Motivated by the need to find good electrocatalysts for water oxidation and O-2 reduction, composed of nontoxic and earth-abundant elements, a systematic screening of two-dimensional ( 2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) is performed. To identify compounds that are intrinsically active and can fully take advantage of the high surface area of 2D catalysts, this study focuses on the properties of the ideal basal planes of 2D TMDCs, in the 2H, 1T, and 1T' phases. Over two hundred materials proposed in computational databases are studied by means of first-principles-based simulations coupled with continuum embedding models to account for the presence of electrochemical environments. The best candidates with overpotentials for the oxygen evolution and reduction reactions (OER and ORR) lower than 0.5 V under acidic conditions and higher stability against degradation in electrochemical environments are selected. For OER, the designed workflow identifies one active and thermodynamically stable material, and seven materials that are metastable at the oxidative potentials and acidic pH. On the other hand, for ORR, we identify 20 materials with overpotentials less than 0.5 V. Among these compounds, six bifunctional materials have been experimentally reported, with 1T-NbTe2 and 1T'-MoTe2 being the best performing catalysts for OER and ORR, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据