4.8 Article

Direct Evidence for Aligned Binding of Cellulase Enzymes to Cellulose Surfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 43, 页码 10684-10688

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02757

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [819039 F-BioIce]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. German Science Foundation [WE 4478/4-1]
  4. NSF [CBET1264459]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineers have been designing new cellulase enzymes for the conversion of biomass into green fuels and chemicals, with a critical factor being the attachment via the enzyme's carbohydrate binding module (CBM). Experimental data and molecular dynamics simulations show that binding is driven by hydrogen bonding and that tyrosine side chains within the CBM align the cellulase with the registry of the cellulose surface. This alignment is favorable for the translocation and effective cellulose breakdown, likely an important parameter for the design of novel enzymes.
The conversion of biomass into green fuels and chemicals is of great societal interest. Engineers have been designing new cellulase enzymes for the breakdown of otherwise insoluble cellulose materials. A barrier to the rational design of new enzymes has been our lack of a molecular picture of how cellulase binding occurs. A critical factor is the attachment via the enzyme's carbohydrate binding module (CBM). To elucidate the structural and mechanistic details of cellulase adsorption, we have combined experimental data from sum frequency generation spectroscopy with molecular dynamics simulations to probe the equilibrium structure and surface alignment of a 14-residue peptide mimicking the CBM. The data show that binding is driven by hydrogen bonding and that tyrosine side chains within the CBM align the cellulase with the registry of the cellulose surface. Such an alignment is favorable for the translocation and effective cellulose breakdown and is therefore likely an important parameter for the design of novel enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据