4.6 Article

Computational Discovery of the Qualitative Electronegativity-Wettability Relationship in High-Temperature Ceramics-Supported TiAl Alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 126, 期 4, 页码 2207-2213

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09728

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [52025041]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972178, 52174294, 51974021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wettability mechanism between high-temperature ceramics (HTCs) and molten TiAl alloys is systematically investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. The results reveal that wettability is related to the electronegativity of metal elements and the Ti content of TiAl alloys.
The inevitable interaction between high-temperature ceramics (HTCs) and molten TiAl alloys during the casting process tends to cause the increased oxygen concentration, fracture, and embrittlement within TiAl alloys, and the interaction is closely related to wettability. Herein, the underlying mechanism of wettability (i.e., contact angle) between HTCs and molten TiAl alloys is systematically investigated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Taking the interaction between the common adopted crucible (i.e., BaZrO3, Y2O3, ZrO2, and Al2O3) and molten TiAl alloys, for example, the calculated contact angles between gamma-TiAl and HTCs decrease in the sequence of BaZrO3, Y2O3, ZrO2, and Al2O3 and with the Ti content of TiAl alloys increasing. This is in agreement with the experimental results, verifying the feasibility of MD simulations. In addition, based on MD simulations, the electronegativity of metal elements within HTCs decreases in the order of Al2O3, ZrO2, Y2O3, and BaZrO3, which further discloses the relationship between electronegativity and wettability, i.e., smaller electronegativity of metal elements leads to worse wettability of HTCs. This might push forward the design of HTCs with better stability, such as BaZrO3 doped by Hf, Y, lanthanide, or actinide elements and BaHfO3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据