4.6 Article

Modification of the Second Harmonic Generation and Fluorescence Efficiency of D289 Dye Based on a Donor-Acceptor Structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 126, 期 4, 页码 2234-2242

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09862

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21973022]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515012117]
  3. Start-up Talent Grant at Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) [HA11409049]
  4. Shenzhen Excellent Science and Technology Innovation Talents Training Project [RCBS20200714114910141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two water-soluble dyes with conjugated donor-acceptor structures were designed and their second-order nonlinear optical properties and fluorescence efficiencies were studied. The modified molecules emitted much less two-photon fluorescence than dye D289 due to nonradiative transitions caused by molecular motions in solution. TPAPM exhibited higher NLO performance than D289 and TPAP because of the strong electron pull-push effect operating along the D-pi-A backbone, making it a promising SHG probe molecule for multimodal imaging in biological applications.
Second harmonic generation (SHG) spectroscopy and microscopy have been widely applied in studying the interfacial processes that occur in chemical, physical, and biological systems. Efficient SHG probes are crucial for these investigations. Herein, we designed two water-soluble dyes with conjugated donor-acceptor structures (TPAP and TPAPM) and studied their second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) properties and fluorescence efficiencies. The modified molecules emitted much less two-photon fluorescence than dye D289 due to nonradiative transitions caused by molecular motions in solution. TPAPM exhibited higher NLO performance than D289 and TPAP because of the strong electron pull-push effect operating along the D-pi-A backbone, and it is a promising SHG probe molecule for multimodal imaging in biological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据