4.6 Article

A Holstein-Peierls Approach to Excimer Spectra: The Evolution from Vibronically Structured to Unstructured Emission

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 126, 期 8, 页码 4067-4081

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c10255

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR1810838, 1625061]
  2. U.S. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-16-2-0189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excimers are commonly found in many organic systems, with broad, structureless, and red-shifted emission. A theoretical model based on a Holstein-Peierls Hamiltonian is proposed to explain absorption and photoluminescence in molecular dimers, showing that excimer emission can be induced through local or nonlocal intermolecular coupling. Incorporating both types of coupling successfully reproduces absorption and excimer emission spectra.
The presence of excimers, as revealed by broad, structureless, and red-shifted emission, is quite common in a great many organic solution-and solid-phase systems. A fundamental theoretical account of excimer creation and relaxation has generated enormous interest over the years. Here, a model based on a Holstein-Peierls Hamiltonian is presented to account for absorption and photoluminescence in molecular dimers. The model extends the Frenkel-charge transfer (CT)-Holstein model in order to account for both local and nonlocal coupling to a slow intermolecular vibrational mode. The model shows that excimer emission can be induced either through (1) local intermolecular coupling to the dimer CT states or through (2) the nonlocal Frenkel-CT coupling terms. Finally, by incorporating both the local and nonlocal intermolecular coupling, the measured absorption and excimer emission spectra for a set of two different bis(perylene diimide) covalently linked dimers are successfully reproduced. The evolution from structured to unstructured excimer emission likely occurs via an increase in the nonlocal coupling, but it can also be induced by the stabilization of the diabatic CT state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据