4.6 Article

Kinetic Regulation of the Synthesis of Pentatwinned Gold Nanorods below Room Temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 43, 页码 23937-23944

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07284

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [861950]
  2. ERC [815128]
  3. Maria de Maeztu Units of Excellence Program from the Spanish State Research Agency [MDM-2017-0720]
  4. [731019]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [815128] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of gold nanorods requires the presence of symmetry-breaking and shape-directing additives, such as bromide ions and quaternary ammonium surfactants. By using hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) as the principal surfactant and a low concentration of bromide, gold nanorods can be synthesized at temperatures as low as 8 degrees C, allowing for temperature-controlled aspect ratio tunability.
The synthesis of gold nanorods requires the presence of symmetry-breaking and shape-directing additives, among which bromide ions and quaternary ammonium surfactants have been reported as essential. As a result, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) has been selected as the most efficient surfactant to direct anisotropic growth. One of the difficulties arising from this selection is the low solubility of CTAB in water at room temperature, and therefore the seeded growth of gold nanorods is usually performed at 25 degrees C or above, which has restricted so far the analysis of kinetic effects derived from lower temperatures. We report a systematic study of the synthesis of gold nanorods from pentatwinned seeds using hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) as the principal surfactant and a low concentration of bromide as shape-directing agent. Under these conditions, the synthesis can be performed at temperatures as low as 8 degrees C, and the corresponding kinetic effects can be studied, resulting in temperature-controlled aspect ratio tunability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据