4.6 Article

Structure of Water at Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Interfaces: Raman Spectroscopy of Water Confined in Periodic Mesoporous (Organo)Silicas

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 126, 期 7, 页码 3520-3531

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09801

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG-ANR collaborative project [ANR-18CE92-0011-01]
  2. DFG-ANR collaborative project (DFG) [Fr 1372/25-1, 407319385, Hu850/11-1]
  3. Center for Molecular Water Science (CMWS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temperature dependence of water structure in hydrophilic and hydrophobic mesostructured porous materials was studied using Raman vibrational spectroscopy. The structure of water in capillary filled pores is similar to bulk water, while the structure in partially filled pores differs significantly.
The temperature dependence of the structure of water confined in hydrophilic mesostructured porous silica (MCM-41) and hydrophobic benzene-bridged periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs) is studied by Raman vibrational spectroscopy. For capillary filled pores (75% relative humidity, RH), the OH stretching region is dominated by the contribution from liquid water situated in the core part of the pore. It adopts a bulklike structure that is modestly disrupted by confinement and surface hydrophobicity. For partially filled pores (33% RH), the structure of the nonfreezable adsorbed film radically differs from that found in capillary filled pores. A first remarkable feature is the absence of the Raman spectral fingerprint of low-density amorphous ice, even at a low temperature (-120 degrees C). Second, additional bands reveal water hydroxyl groups pointing toward the different water/solid and water/vapor interfaces. For MCM-41, they correspond to water molecules acting as weak H-bond donors with silica and dangling hydroxyl groups oriented toward the empty center of the pore. For benzene-bridged PMO, we found an additional type of dangling hydroxyl groups, which we attribute to water at the hydrophobic solid interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据