4.5 Article

Self-Propelled Chemical Garden Tubes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 51, 页码 13908-13915

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c09088

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1609495]
  2. NASA [80NSSC18K1361]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1609495] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthetic autonomous locomotion has great potential in various research fields, showcasing targeted drug/cargo delivery and circumvention of kinetic and thermodynamic limitations. In this study, hollow cylindrical structures rich in catalytic manganese oxide were grown through the self-organization of precipitate tubes in chemical gardens, achieving self-propulsion through the ejection of oxygen bubbles. The method and key results are expected to be applicable to a wide range of materials and reactions.
Synthetic autonomous locomotion shows great promise in many research fields, including biomedicine and environmental science, because it can allow targeted drug/cargo delivery and the circumvention of kinetic and thermodynamic limitations. Creating such self-moving objects often requires advanced production techniques as exemplified by catalytic, gas-forming microrockets. Here, we grow such structures via the self-organization of precipitate tubes in chemical gardens by simply injecting metal salts into silicate solutions. This method generates hollow, cylindrical objects rich in catalytic manganese oxide that also feature a partially insulating outer layer of inert silica. In dilute H2O2 solution, these structures undergo self-propulsion by ejecting streams of oxygen bubbles. Each emission event pushes the tube forward by 1-2 tube radii. The ejection frequency depends linearly on the peroxide concentration as quantified by acoustic measurements of bursting bubbles. We expect our facile method and key results to be applicable to a diverse range of materials and reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据