4.5 Article

Ozark Graphene Nanopore for Efficient Water Desalination

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 40, 页码 11256-11263

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c06327

关键词

-

资金

  1. CMU Mechanical Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The geometry of graphene nanopores plays a significant role in their water desalination performance, with the irregular ozark graphene nanopore able to reject more ions while maintaining high water permeation rate compared to circular pores. By comparing various pore shapes, including circular, triangular, rhombic, and ozark, potential physical reasons for the outstanding performance of the ozark nanopore have been revealed. The study further demonstrates the potential of graphene for efficient water desalination.
A nanoporous graphene membrane is crucial to energy-efficient reverse osmosis water desalination given its high permeation rate and ion selectivity. However, the ion selectivity of the common circular graphene nanopore is dependent on the pore size and scales inversely with the water permeation rate. Larger, circular graphene nanopores give rise to the high water permeation rate but compromise the ability to reject ions. Therefore, the pursuit of a higher permeation rate while maintaining high ion selectivity can be challenging. In this work, we discover that the geometry of graphene nanopore can play a significant role in its water desalination performance. We demonstrate that the ozark graphene nanopore, which has an irregular slim shape, can reject over 12% more ions compared with a circular nanopore with the same water permeation rate. To reveal the physical reason behind the outstanding performance of the ozark nanopore, we compared it with circular, triangular, and rhombic pores from perspectives including interfacial water density, energy barrier, water/ion distribution in pores, the ion-water RDF in pores, and the hydraulic diameter. The ozark graphene nanopore further explores the potential of graphene for efficient water desalination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据