4.5 Article

O-Methylation in Carbohydrates: An NMR and MD Simulation Study with Application to Methylcellulose

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 43, 页码 11967-11979

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07293

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2017-03703, 201805973]
  2. The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared molecular conformations and solvation free energies of methylated carbohydrates using simulations and experimental data, validating the effectiveness of interaction potentials for specialized purposes. It revealed that 6-O-methylation has minimal impact on exocyclic torsion, with consistent solvation free energies between nonmethylated and methylated molecules.
Methylated carbohydrates are important from both biological and technical perspectives. Specifically, methylcellulose is an interesting cellulose derivative that has applications in foods, materials, cosmetics, and many other fields. While the molecular dynamics simulation technique has the potential for both advancing the fundamental understanding of this polymer and aiding in the development of specific applications, a general drawback is the lack of experimentally validated interaction potentials for the methylated moieties. In the present study, simulations using the GROMOS 56 carbohydrate force field are compared to NMR spin-spin coupling constants related to the conformation of the exocyclic torsion angle omega in D-glucopyranose and derivatives containing a 6-O-methyl substituent and a C-13-isotopologue thereof. A (3)J(CC) Karplus-type relationship is proposed for the C5-C6-O6-C-Me torsion angle. Moreover, solvation free energies are compared to experimental data for small model compounds. Alkylation in the form of 6-O-methylation affects exocyclic torsion only marginally. Computed solvation free energies between nonmethylated and methylated molecules were internally consistent, which validates the application of these interaction potentials for more specialized purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据