4.6 Article

Production and viscosity of Xanthan Gum are increased by LED irradiation of X. campestris cultivated in medium containing produced water of the oil industry

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112356

关键词

Biopolymer; MEOR; Photo-stimulation; Thermoplastic property

资金

  1. National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq
  3. Scottish Funding Council Global Challenges Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that LED irradiation (630 nm wavelength) during both the growth and production phases of Xanthomonas campestris can increase both the production and viscosity of Xanthan gum.
Oil recovery is a challenge and microbial enhanced oil recovery is an option. We theorized that the use of produced water (PW) with photo-stimulation could influence both production and viscosity of Xanthan gum. This study aimed at the evaluation of the effect of photo-stimulation by lambda 630 +/- 1 rim LED light on the biosynthesis of Xanthan gum produced by Xanthomonas campestris IBSBF 2103 strain reusing PW of the oil industry. We assessed the effect of photo-stimulation by LED light (lambda 630 nm) on the biosynthesis of Xanthan gum produced by X. campestris in medium containing produced water. Different energy densities applied during the microbial growth phase were tested. The highest production was achieved when using 12 J/cm(2) LED light (p < 0.01). Three protocols were assessed: Non-irradiated (Control), Irradiation with LED light during the growth phase (LEDgrowth) and Irradiation with LED light during both growth and production phases (LEDgrowth+pro-duction). Both the amount and viscosity of the xanthan gum was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the group LEDgrowth+production. The study showed that LED irradiation (lambda 630 +/- 1 rim) during both the growth and production phases of the biopolymer increased both the production and viscosity of Xanthan gum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据