4.5 Article

Arclogites in the Subarc Lower Crust: Effects of Crystallization, Partial Melting, and Retained Melt on the Foundering Ability of Residual Roots

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLOGY
卷 62, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egab094

关键词

partial melting; foundering; deep crustal hot zone; Cordilleran arc; arclogite

资金

  1. U.S. NSF [EAR1725002, EAR2020935]
  2. Romanian Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development, and Innovative Funding (UEFISCDI) [PNIII-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0014]
  3. Universite Claude Bernard de Lyon
  4. BQR Accueil EC
  5. F.R.S.-FNRS [1. B. 414.20F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research examines the impact of retained melt and protolith lithology on the density evolution and foundering susceptibility of the subarc root in thick-crusted Cordilleran arcs. It suggests that high melt volumes are required to stabilize the root in the lower crust, and the protolith composition can greatly affect the density and ability to founder. The study also analyzes the effects of partial melting of different lower crustal protoliths and their influence on the foundering process, providing insights into the complex processes driving magmatism in Cordilleran arcs.
Thick-crusted (>45 km) Cordilleran arcs exhibit cyclic processes including periods of magmatic quiescence interspersed with pulses of high-flux magmatism. Most models assume that during high-flux events, fractional crystallization and partial melting within the deep crustal hot zone generate a dense (>3.4 g/cm(3)) arclogitic subarc root that can readily founder into the mantle. Yet these models do not consider that: (1) the retention of low-density melt within the subarc root, and (2) the protolith lithology of the restitic portion of the subarc root may greatly impact the density evolution of the root and its susceptibility to foundering. In this article, we first address the effect of retained melt on the foundering ability of the subarc root by calculating the density and time for foundering of melt-bearing arclogitic residue at 1.5, 2, and 2.5 GPa. We find that melt volumes >10-18% are required to stabilize the root within the lower crust; melt volumes below this threshold lower the viscosity of the residue so much so as to decrease the time for foundering by an order of magnitude. We then constrain through phase equilibria modeling the effect of partial melting of different lower crustal protoliths on the density of the restitic subarc root. To do this, we model the density and mineralogical evolution of restites in equilibrium with their derivative melts during open-system, isobaric partial melting of typical crustal assemblages from 600-1100 degrees C at 1.5 (similar to 50 km) and 2 GPa (similar to 65 km). In our models, typical end-member assemblages in a lower crustal hot zone include basalt, metapelite, and metagraywacke. We find that melt-depleted restites derived from basaltic compositions are amphibole-bearing arclogites with densities conducive to foundering, which at 2 GPa can occur even in the presence of the coexisting hydrous felsic residual melt. Foundering of the amphibole +/- melt-bearing root may refertilize the mantle wedge and induce melting of the surrounding asthenosphere as well as the arclogitic mass. However, if temperatures in a 50-km deep subarc hot zone are not sufficient to drive melt depletion of basaltic restites, these dense (3.1-3.3 g/cm(3)) residues are gravitationally stable, increasing the density of the lower crust and lowering the elevation of the arc. In comparison, partial melting of metasedimentary country rock produces alkali feldspar-rich residues that never achieve densities conducive to foundering. Thus, if high-flux events are driven by the influx of melt-fertile lithosphere beneath the arc as envisioned by the Cordilleran cycle model, then partial melting of the metasedimentary portion will generate low-density residues that remain in the lower crust and contribute to the thickness, geochemistry, and seismic structure of the bulk arc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据