4.5 Article

UAV-based remote sensing for the petroleum industry and environmental monitoring: State-of-the-art and perspectives

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109633

关键词

UAV; UAS; Drone remote sensing; Oil and gas industry; Detection and inspection; Petroleum exploration and mapping

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/25002-7]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [309712/2017-30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the use of UAV technology in the petroleum industry for mapping, monitoring, inspection, and surveillance procedures. Drones offer a faster, safer, and more cost-efficient way of data collection in the oil and gas industry.
An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), popularly known as a drone, is an aircraft without a human pilot aboard. Recent developments in sensor technology and navigation systems have made drones a powerful and reliable basis for professional data acquisition. Today, the use of UAVs has expanded massively in the civil and commercial sectors and this technology has found its way into almost every industrial sector including the petroleum industry. Drone technology offers a great potential to revolutionize the mapping, monitoring, inspection, and surveillance procedures of the petroleum industry by providing a faster, safer, and more cost-efficient way of mass data collection. This article offers a review of the common UAV platforms and sensor systems and highlights the state-of-the-art and application examples of drone remote sensing in the oil and gas industry. Six broad areas are recognized comprising offshore oil spill detection, oil leakage detection, pipeline monitoring, gas emission sensing, remote facility inspection, petroleum exploration (i.e., land surveying, geologic mapping, and petroleum exploration), and environmental monitoring. Research gaps and open issues along with opportunities for further developments in each of these areas are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据