4.5 Article

Experimental study on the wax removal physics of foam pig in crude oil pipeline pigging

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108881

关键词

Mechanical pigging; Foam pig; Wax removal physics; Wax breaking force; Wax removal efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSF) [51534007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the wax removal physics of foam pigs was experimentally investigated, and a five-phase description of wax resistive force was proposed; the effects of foam pig density, wax yield stress, and wax layer thickness on the wax removal efficiency were further discussed.
Mechanical pigging is the most conventional method to mitigate the wax deposition in the field pipeline. However, wax removal physics of foam pig is still poorly understood. In this work, wax removal physics of foam pig is experimentally investigated in the pigging facility. Furthermore, wax removal physics of foam pig is proposed and further evaluated. Due to the energy absorption of foam pig during its elastic buckling, the wax resistive force of foam pig presents five phases including the build-up phase, pre-plug phase, damping phase, plug phase, and production phase. In the five-phase pigging process, the initial wax breaking force has a high risk of the pig stuck in the field compared to the steady wax breaking force. It is also noted that the wax removal physics changes when the wax yield stress and the wax layer thickness are increased. The effects of foam pig density, wax yield stress, and wax layer thickness on the wax breaking force and the wax removal efficiency are discussed. Furthermore, force analysis physical models and the energy absorption of foam pig are proposed to illustrate the experimental results. The effect of foam pig density on the wax breaking force is different for the wax layers with different strength. The wax removal efficiency of the low-density foam pig is significantly reduced for high strength wax layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据