4.5 Review

Polymeric surfactants for enhanced oil recovery: A review of recent progress

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109358

关键词

Chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR); Polymeric surfactants; Recovery mechanisms; Viscosity; Interfacial tension; Wettability

资金

  1. Centre for Graduate Studies, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymeric surfactants have emerged as a viable alternative to conventional chemical methods in enhancing hydrocarbon recovery, offering multifunctional mechanisms such as viscosity increment and interfacial tension reduction for improved mobility control and fluid redistribution.
Chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) is a well-recognized technique for exploiting the original oil in place (OOIP) left behind in subsurface petroleum reservoirs after primary and secondary recovery processes. However, CEOR is not practiced or implemented widely because of project cost, operational and technical complexity, and environmental risks. Polymeric surfactants have emerged as a viable alternative to conventional chemical methods. They offer multifunctional mechanisms such as viscosity increment and interfacial tension (IFT) reduction. Thus, they are thought to be more versatile in enhancing recovery due to mobility control and wettability-induced fluid redistribution. This review presents a summary of recent studies in the literature that provides new insights into the properties, mechanisms, and applications of polymeric surfactants related to improved hydrocarbon recovery. From the published studies, fluid-fluid interactions influencing rheology and IFT, and fluid-rock interactions dictating wettability alteration and adsorption tendencies, are systematically evaluated. Implications of these mechanisms on enhanced hydrocarbon recovery by the polymeric surfactants are analyzed. Recent advances and knowledge gaps are highlighted, and possible directions to improve research methodology are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据