4.1 Article

The Importance of Sociocultural Context When Choosing to Eat Healthier

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 143-150

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.08.019

关键词

eating behavior; working women; social conformity; cultural values; Malaysia

资金

  1. Yale Sustainable Food Program's Global Food Fellowship
  2. Dull Family Summer Internship Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time scarcity and limited sociocultural support for behavior change pose major barriers to healthy eating among working women in metropolitan Malaysia.
Objective: To explore how working women in metropolitan Malaysia make food decisions. Design: A grounded theory approach and semistructured interviews. Setting: A large university in metropolitan Malaysia. Participants: Twenty-four female employees purposively recruited to vary in ethnicity, body mass index, age, and marital status via convenience sampling. Phenomenon of Interest: Perceptions of sociocultural influences on healthy eating behavior among working women. Analysis: Researchers audio-recorded interviews and analyzed verbatim transcripts. Results: Working women shared a desire to eat a healthier, more balanced diet by reducing processed food consumption through home-cooked meals. Participants described aspects of their living situations and cultural values about food that made it seem impossible to change their diets. Living with other people limited their ability to cook the food they wanted to eat. In addition, unspoken rules about communal eating in Malaysia, such as not refusing food and not wasting food, prevented working women from practicing healthy eating. Conclusions and Implications: In this population of working women in metropolitan Malaysia, experiences of time scarcity and limited sociocultural support for behavior change were major barriers to healthy eating. Interventions could prioritize leveraging these realities about food to facilitate environments in which women feel like they have control of their own food intake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据