4.3 Article

Benchmark study of particle and heavy-ion transport code system using shielding integral benchmark archive and database for accelerator-shielding experiments

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 665-675

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2021.1993372

关键词

PHITS; JENDL-4.0/HE; Monte Carlo calculation; benchmark; SINBAD; neutron-shielding; proton accelerator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The benchmark study of PHITS version 3.24 using neutron-shielding experiments from SINBAD demonstrated satisfactory overall agreements when simulating neutron- and proton-induced reactions up to 200 MeV with JENDL-4.0/HE, but discrepancies were found in neutron production and scatterings at energies below 100 MeV using default settings in the code system. It was concluded that using JENDL-4.0/HE in PHITS calculations is preferable.
To validate the accuracy of the general-purpose Monte Carlo Particle and Heavy-Ion Transport code System (PHITS), a benchmark study of the recent version (version 3.24) of PHITS has been conducted using neutron-shielding experiments listed in the Shielding Integral Benchmark Archive and Database (SINBAD). Five neutron sources were selected, which are generated from (1) 43- and 68-MeV proton-induced reaction on a thin lithium target, (2) 52-MeV proton-induced reaction on a thick graphite target, (3) 590-MeV proton-induced reaction on a thick lead target, (4) 500-MeV proton-induced reaction on a thick tungsten target, and (5) 800-MeV proton-induced reaction on a thick tantalum target. For all these cases, overall agreements between the experimental and calculated results were satisfactory to simulate neutron- and proton-induced reactions up to 200 MeV when using the Japanese evaluated nuclear data library JENDL-4.0/HE; however, using default settings in the code system made discrepancies between the results in neutron production and scatterings in shielding materials with energies lower than 100 MeV. The present study revealed that it is preferable to use JENDL-4.0/HE in the PHITS calculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据