4.7 Article

Structural units of binary vanadate glasses by X-ray and neutron diffraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 572, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121120

关键词

Glass structure; X-ray diffraction; Neutron diffraction; Vanadate glasses; Second-order Jahn-Teller effects

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of the United States [NSF-DMR 1746230]
  2. Science and Engineering Research Board of India [SB/S2/JCB-33/2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction were used to study binary vanadate glasses containing MgO, Na2O, and K2O, with further analysis on glasses containing amorphous V2O5. The study showed that the glass structure widely excludes three-fold coordinated oxygen, with definite deformations of VO6 units and out-of-center displacements of V5+ ions attributed to second-order Jahn-Teller effects. The study also suggests that these mechanisms are effective in glass structures, with different V-O distances in the model allowing for consistent modeling of bond length distributions.
X-ray diffraction with high-energy photons (synchrotron) and neutron diffraction are performed on binary vanadate glasses with MgO, Na2O, K2O to determine their structural units. The interpretation includes results of further binary vanadate glasses where vitreous V2O5 plays a key role. Different to the V2O5 crystal the structural model of the glass widely excludes three-fold coordinated oxygen according to Zachariasen's rules of glass formation. Results from the literature of an extensive analysis of vanadate crystals are used. VO6 units exist in definite deformations. The corresponding out-of-center displacements of the V5+ ions are attributed to the second-order Jahn-Teller effects. The corresponding mechanisms are suggested to be effective also in glass structures. Two, three or four different V-O distances of this model are taken into account and allow a consistent modelling of the distributions of the bond lengths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据