4.7 Article

MRI of the intraspinal nerve roots in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies: abnormalities correlate with clinical phenotypes

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 269, 期 6, 页码 3159-3166

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10864-4

关键词

MRI; Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; Multifocal motor neuropathy; Motor neuron disease; Intra-spinal nerve roots; Intradural nerve roots

资金

  1. Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds [W.OR17-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used MRI to visualize intra-spinal nerve roots in patients with CIDP, MMN, and MND, and found morphological changes that were consistent with their clinical phenotype.
Objective Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are caused by inflammatory changes of peripheral nerves. It is unknown if the intra-spinal roots are also affected. This MRI study systematically visualized intra-spinal nerve roots, i.e., the ventral and dorsal roots, in patients with CIDP, MMN and motor neuron disease (MND). Methods We performed a cross-sectional study in 40 patients with CIDP, 27 with MMN and 34 with MND. All patients underwent an MRI scan of the cervical intra-spinal roots. We systematically measured intra-spinal nerve root sizes bilaterally in the transversal plane at C5, C6 and C7 level. We calculated mean nerve root sizes and compared them between study groups and between different clinical phenotypes using a univariate general linear model. Results Patients with MMN and CIDP with a motor phenotype had thicker ventral roots compared to patients with CIDP with a sensorimotor phenotype (p = 0.012), while patients with CIDP with a sensory phenotype had thicker dorsal roots compared to patients with a sensorimotor phenotype (p = 0.001) and with MND (p = 0.004). Conclusion We here show changes in the morphology of intra-spinal nerve roots in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies, compatible with their clinical phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据