4.2 Article

Cell type specificity of glucocorticoid signaling in the adult mouse hippocampus

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jne.13072

关键词

corticosteroid receptors; hippocampus; single-cell RNA sequencing; stress hormones; transcription regulation

资金

  1. Corcept Therapeutics
  2. NWO Gravitation project BRAINSCAPES : A roadmap from Neurosciences to Neurobiology [024.004.012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoid stress hormones can affect mood and cognitive processes in the brain, with the hippocampus being a prominent target expressing GR and MR receptors. Analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data confirmed cell-type specificity of GR and MR signaling, providing insights into cellular basis of glucocorticoid effects on hippocampal function.
Glucocorticoid stress hormones are powerful modulators of brain function and can affect mood and cognitive processes. The hippocampus is a prominent glucocorticoid target and expresses both the glucocorticoid receptor (GR: Nr3c1) and the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR: Nr3c2). These nuclear steroid receptors act as ligand-dependent transcription factors. Transcriptional effects of glucocorticoids have often been deduced from bulk mRNA measurements or spatially informed individual gene expression. However, only sparse data exists allowing insights on glucocorticoid-driven gene transcription at the cell type level. Here, we used publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing data to assess the cell-type specificity of GR and MR signaling in the adult mouse hippocampus. The data confirmed that Nr3c1 and Nr3c2 expression differs across neuronal and non-neuronal cell populations. We analyzed co-expression with sex hormones receptors, transcriptional coregulators, and receptors for neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Our results provide insights in the cellular basis of previous bulk mRNA results and allow the formulation of more defined hypotheses on the effects of glucocorticoids on hippocampal function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据