4.4 Article

Template-assisted synthesis of porous Co3O4 nanosheet with excellent electrochemical performance for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-021-05359-2

关键词

Cobalt oxide; Filter paper template; Nanosheet structure; Anode materials; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571110]
  2. NSF of Zhejiang province [LY18B010003]
  3. NSF of Ningbo [2019A610002]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry (FJIRSM, CAS) [20190028]
  5. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated exceptional electrochemical performance of porous Co3O4 nanosheet as an anode for LIBs, synthesized using quantitative filter papers as sacrificial template, which facilitated Li-ion diffusion and electron transport, leading to improved cycling performance.
The high-performance electrode materials with great rate capability and long cycling life are partly attributed to the microstructure and morphology of the as-prepared electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Here, we report a facile and efficient synthetic method utilizing quantitative filter papers with negligible impurity residues in the calcining process as a sacrificial template to prepare porous Co3O4 nanosheet employed as anode for LIBs. In consequence, it presents extraordinary cycling performance, e.g., superior initial specific capacity of 1326mAh g(-1) and a high reversible specific capacity of 1000 mAh g(-1) after 50 cycles at a current density of 100 mAg -1 . The excellent electrochemical performance is ascribed to the typical porous sheet-like structure facilitating Li-ion diffusion and electron transport and alleviating considerable volume expansion in the process of lithiation/delithiation. Herein, the low-cost and eco-friendly synthetic method of porous Co3O4 nanosheet could provide some enlightenment in practical application for LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据