4.6 Article

Sonochemical synthesis of the novel 1D zig-zag Hg(II)-Iodo bridged metal-organic coordination compounds with thiosemicarbazide derivative ligand

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131902

关键词

Crystal structure; Coordination polymer; Hg (II) complex; Structural characterization; Ultrasonic irradiation

资金

  1. 2021 Yeungnam University Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, a novel mercury (II) metal organic coordination compound with nano rods shape was successfully prepared using an ultrasonic method. The compound exhibited a zig-zag 1D polymer structure and a 3D supramolecular metal organic polymer structure. The study also found that high-intensity ultrasound is a facile, versatile, and eco-friendly synthetic tool for supramolecular coordination compounds.
In the present research, a novel mercury (II) metal organic coordination compound, [Hg(Q)I-2](n) (Q = pyridine-4-carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazide) with nano rods shape was prepared applying an ultrasonic manner. The synthesized compound was determined with infrared spectroscopy (IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). In solid-state, the coordination polymer takes the appearance of a zig-zag 1D polymer. The coordination number of Hg (II) is four by one sulfur atom of organic ligand and three iodine atoms which two of iodine atoms are coordinated to other repeating units, and one of iodine is unattached. The zig-zag 1D chains interact with neighboring chains via weak interactions, making a 3D supramolecular metal organic polymer. It was found that using high-intensity ultrasound is a facile, versatile, and eco-friendly synthetic instrument for supramolecular coordination compounds. Also, types of non-covalent interactions in the structure cause extraordinary flexibility to perform secondary interactions and create the property of attracting guests to this host. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据