4.6 Article

Synthesis of n-dodecylamine borane C12H25NH2BH3, its stability against hydrolysis, and its characterization in THF

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1248, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131484

关键词

Amine borane; Dihydrogen bonding; Dodecylamine; Hydrolysis; Self-assembly

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-LABX-05-01, ANR-18-CE05-0032]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE05-0032] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that molecular self-assembly of n-dodecylamine borane in anhydrous THF forms core-shell aggregates, with NH2BH3 groups in the core and alkyl chains in the outer layer. However, the compound is unstable in the presence of moisture, hydrolyzing to produce water-soluble borates. Therefore, investigating the behavior and properties of C12AB should be conducted under anhydrous conditions.
Dihydrogen H delta+center dot center dot center dot H delta- bonding that is accepted as an important unconventional hydrogen bonding could play a key role in molecular self-assembly of amine boranes. It is with this goal in mind that we have studied the behavior of n-dodecylamine borane nC(12)H(25)NH(2)BH(3) (C12AB) dissolved in anhydrous THF. C12AB can be easily synthesized with a purity higher than 99% by Lewis acid-base reaction of a BH3 complex with n-dodecylamine nC(12)H(25)NH(2). It is stable when dissolved in THF that is a good solvent of it. However, it is unstable in the presence of moisture, readily hydrolyzing and producing water-soluble borates. Molecular self-assembly of C12AB has thus to be studied in anhydrous conditions, which allows observing by DLS and SAXS-WAXS the formation of core-shell aggregates in anhydrous THF. The aggregates consist of about five self-assembling stretched C12AB molecules where the NH2BH3 groups are in the core of 3 angstrom and the alkyl chains in an outer-shell. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据