4.6 Article

Tuning the compositional configuration of hydroxyapatite modified with vanadium ions including thermal stability and antibacterial properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130713

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Cell viability; Cytotoxicity; Antibacterial activity; Vanadium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, vanadate ions were incorporated into hydroxyapatite lattice with different concentrations using the co-precipitation technique. The presence of vanadate dopants significantly affected lattice parameters, thermal stability, and antibacterial properties of the resulting biomaterial.
Different contributions of vanadate ions have been incorporated into hydroxyapatite (HAP) lattice with different concentrations using the co-precipitation technique. Vanadate ions have introduced a structural change of the HAP formula to be as: [Ca-10(PO)(6-x)(VO4)(x)(OH)(2)]; whereas 0.0 <= x <= 1.2. Vanadate dopants have a considerable effect on lattice parameters, whereas the a-axis starts from 9.483 angstrom and expands to its maxima of 9.602 angstrom. However, the c-axis begins with 6.916 angstrom and plunges to 6.853 angstrom for x = 0.0 and 0.6, respectively. Moreover, the compositions showed higher thermal stability till x = 1.0; then, it declined sharply. The thermodynamic parameters accompanied by the thermal degradation process have been calculated using Coats-Redfern and Horowitz-Metzger methods. Both dehydration and decomposition kinetics show endothermic, non-spontaneous, and slow decomposition reactions. The cell viability was enhanced for V-HAP and reached its highest value of 99.4 %. The highest vanadate concentration, the more effective as antibacterial material, whose inhibition zone reaches its maximum values of 20.4 +/- 1.5 and 19.5 +/- 1.3 mm against E. coli and S. aureus respectively. Subsequently, these types of biomaterials could be suggested for potential clinical applications. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据