4.7 Article

Novel green synthetic approach for liquid crystalline materials using multi-component reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 346, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118244

关键词

Disk-shaped liquid crystals; Green synthesis; Multi-component reactions; discotic nematic (N-D); Naphtho-oxazine

资金

  1. Vision Group on Science and Technology (VGST), Government of Karnataka [24]
  2. DST PURSE programme Phase II [SR/PURSE Phase-2/36(C) (G)]
  3. UGC-FRP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports the synthesis of disk-shape liquid crystalline materials using multi-component reactions. Two new series of compounds were successfully synthesized and characterized. The synthetic approach provides multiple advantages and could pave a new way in the synthesis of liquid crystalline compounds.
We report the synthesis of disk-shape liquid crystalline materials using multi-component reactions (MCR). Two new series, 3,9-di(3',4',5'-tris-alkyloxy)phenyl-2,3,4,8,9,10-hexahydronaphtho[1,2-e:5,6-e'] bis([1,3]oxazine) and 3,10-di((3',4',5'-tris-alkyloxy)phenyl)-2,3,4,9,10,11-hexahydronaphtho[1,2-e:4,3-e']bis([1,3]oxazine) synthesized by coupling either 2,3-dihydroxy naphthalene or 2,6-dihydroxy naphthalene with 3,4,5-tris-O-alkylated anilines in a solvent free condition. The molecular structure of the new materials was confirmed using H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR and CHN elemental analysis. The phase behavior investigated using polarizing optical microscope (POM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments. All the materials exhibit room temperature discotic nematic (N-D) during the cooling cycles as confirmed by X-ray diffraction studies. This synthetic approach provides multiple advantages such as high atom economy (AE), short reaction time, gentle reaction condition, simple workup, and do not require column chromatography purification, additionally this could pave a new way in the synthesis of liquid crystalline compounds. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据