4.7 Article

Effect of alkyl chain length and halide ions on the corrosion inhibition potential of imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids: Computational studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117848

关键词

Ionic liquids; Imidazolium ionic liquids; Pyridinium ionic liquids; Effect of alkyl chain length; Hydrophobicity and adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through DFT computational study, it was found that imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids exhibit good anticorrosive potential, with corrosion inhibition performance depending on the nature of alkyl groups and halide ions. Among the studied ionic liquids, certain compounds were found to show the best corrosion inhibition performance in both imidazolium and pyridinium based categories.
In the present investigation, thirty imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids are undertaken for DFT based computational study to demonstrate the anticorrosive potential. Results showed that imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids act as effective anticorrosive materials and their corrosion inhibition performance depends on the nature of alkyl groups and halide ions. Among the studied imidazolium based ionic liquids, 3-octyl-IH-imidazol-3-ium chloride (IM-C-8-Cl), 3-hexadecyl-IH-imidazol-3-ium bromide (IM-C-16-Br) and 3-butyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium iodide (IM-C-4-I) behave as the best among the chloro, bromo and iodide substituted imidazolium based ionic liquids, respectively. In the pyridinium based ionic liquids, 1-hexadecylpyridin-l-ium chloride (Pyr-C-16-0), 1-dodecylpyridin-1-ium bromide (Pyr-C12-Br) and 1-octylpyridin-1-ium iodide (Pyr-C-8-I) act as the best corrosion inhibitors among the chloro, bromo and iodide substituted pyridinium based ionic liquids, respectively. Adsorption behavior of pyridinium and imidazolium based ionic liquids and corrosion inhibition using them has also been proposed in the present study. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据