4.4 Article

A mucin-responsive hybrid two-component system controls Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron colonization and gut homeostasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 215-223

出版社

MICROBIOLOGICAL SOCIETY KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-022-1649-3

关键词

Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron; hybrid two-component system; mucin; colonization; colitis

资金

  1. Suh Kyungbae Foundation
  2. POSCO Science Fellowship of POSCO TJ Park Foundation
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea [2020R1I1A1A-01052942]
  4. BK21 Fellowship from the Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identifies a genetic determinant, BT2391, for Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron colonization in the gut. The BT2391 mutant shows increased competitive fitness and adherence ability, but it may promote colitis under specific dietary conditions.
The mammalian intestinal tract contains trillions of bacteria. However, the genetic factors that allow gut symbiotic bacteria to occupy intestinal niches remain poorly understood. Here, we identified genetic determinants required for Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron colonization in the gut using transposon sequencing analysis. Transposon insertion in BT2391, which encodes a hybrid two-component system, increased the competitive fitness of B. thetaiotaomicron. The BT2391 mutant showed a growth advantage in a mucin-dependent manner and had an increased ability to adhere to mucus-producing cell lines. The increased competitive advantage of the BT2391 mutant was dependent on the BT2392-2395 locus containing susCD homologs. Deletion of BT2391 led to changes in the expression levels of B. thetaiotaomicron genes during gut colonization. However, colonization of the BT2391 mutant promoted DSS colitis in low-fiber diet-fed mice. These results indicate that BT2391 contributes to a sustainable symbiotic relationship by maintaining a balance between mucosal colonization and gut homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据