4.7 Article

Recovery of Cr(VI) and removal of cationic metals from chromium slag using a modified bipolar membrane system

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 639, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119772

关键词

Chromium slag; Electrodialysis; Bipolar membrane; Recovery; Removal

资金

  1. Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2019Y0010]
  2. National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China [21507069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The BMED system is capable of simultaneously recovering Cr(VI) and removing Cr(III), Fe3+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ from chromium slag. Increasing the number of chromium slag compartments can enhance recovery efficiency. The interchange of chromium states benefits the recovery of heavy metals.
A bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED) system equipped with a 'back-to-back' chromium slag compartment was fabricated to simultaneously recover hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) as Na2CrO4 and remove trivalent chromium (Cr(III)), Fe3+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ from chromium slag. Desorption experiments showed that the solution pH had a significant effect on the heavy-metal desorption efficiency from chromium slag. The BMED system can effectively recover more than 70.6% of Cr(VI) and simultaneously remove more than 99.9% of Fe3+, 87.8% of Mg2+, 26.2% of Ca2+ and 23.1% of Cr(III). When the number of 'back-to-back' chromium slag compartment modules was increased from one to two and three, the current efficiency increased from 11.2% to 17.2% and to 39.1%, respectively, while the amount of recovered heavy metals increased by factors of two and three, respectively. An analysis of the binding states showed that different chromium states were interchanging, which is beneficial to the Cr(VI) recovery and the Cr(III) removal. The experimental results indicated that the BMED system is as an effective technique for the simultaneous recovery of Cr(VI) and removal of Cr(III) from chromium slag and other types of solid waste contaminated with heavy metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据