4.7 Article

Pore-scale numerical study of intrinsic permeability for fluid flow through asymmetric ceramic microfiltration membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 642, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119920

关键词

LBM; DEM; Pore-scale; Asymmetric ceramic MF membrane; Intrinsic permeability

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP180101232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a numerical model to simulate fluid flow through an asymmetric ceramic MF membrane and found that pore size and porosity are key parameters determining membrane permeability. By deriving a new intrinsic permeability function, the model can accurately predict membrane permeability.
The asymmetric ceramic microfiltration (MF) membrane is widely used in water treatment processes, yet the dependence of its intrinsic permeability on the microstructure parameters of different layers are not thoroughly understood. In this study, a numerical model combining the Discrete Element Method (DEM) with Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) is developed to simulate the fluid flow through the detailed pore structure of an asymmetric ceramic MF membrane. The model is validated by comparing the simulated pure water permeability to experimental data with an average deviation of 8% (Max similar to 25%). The simulation results show that the pore size D-50 and porosity epsilon, of the top and intermediate layers are dominant microstructure parameters that determine the membrane pure water permeability. A new asymmetric ceramic MF membrane intrinsic permeability Km as a function of D-50, epsilon and layer thickness h of both top and intermediate layers is derived. The verification of this Km correlation is conducted by comparison with experimental data and Carman-Kozeny (C-K), HagenPoiseuille (H-P) correlations, indicating the proposed Km correlation can accurately predict the membrane permeability. It provides a useful tool for a fundamental understanding of the effect of membrane microstructures on intrinsic permeability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据