4.7 Article

Structure-Activity Relationship of USP5 Inhibitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 20, 页码 15017-15036

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00889

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-201904416]
  2. Huntington's Disease Society of America Berman Topper Career Development Fellowship
  3. Mexican National Council on Science and Technology (CONACyT)
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Bristol Myers Squibb
  6. Genentech
  7. Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-196]
  8. EU/EFPIA/OICR/McGill/KTH/Diamond Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [EUbOPEN] [875510]
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck KGaA
  11. Pfizer
  12. Takeda
  13. Bayer AG [1097737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A chemical probe targeting USP5 has been developed and shown to competitively inhibit the enzyme's catalytic activity by occupying the C-terminal ubiquitin-binding site. Compound 64 has high binding affinity to USP5 and selectivity over other proteins, providing a potential tool for elucidating the function of USP5 in cells.
USP5 is a deubiquitinase that has been implicated in a range of diseases, including cancer, but no USP5-targeting chemical probe has been reported to date. Here, we present the progression of a chemical series that occupies the C-terminal ubiquitin-binding site of a poorly characterized zinc-finger ubiquitin binding domain (ZnF-UBD) of USP5 and competitively inhibits the catalytic activity of the enzyme. Exploration of the structure-activity relationship, complemented with crystallo-graphic characterization of the ZnF-UBD bound to multiple ligands, led to the identification of 64, which binds to the USP5 ZnF-UBD with a K-D of 2.8 mu M and is selective over nine proteins containing structurally similar ZnF-UBD domains. 64 inhibits the USP5 catalytic cleavage of a di-ubiquitin substrate in an in vitro assay. This study provides a chemical and structural framework for the discovery of a chemical probe to delineate USP5 function in cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据