4.7 Article

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Triazolone Derivatives as Potent PPARα/δ Dual Agonists for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 2571-2592

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81730094, 81773584, 21977118, 82073707, 82104002]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20202009, BK20210421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a series of novel triazolone derivatives as PPAR alpha/delta dual agonists, with compound H11 showing potent and well-balanced PPAR alpha/delta agonistic activity. H11 also exhibited strong anti-NASH effects in preclinical models, indicating its potential for treating NASH and other inflammatory and fibrotic diseases.
Peroxisome proliferator-activator receptors alpha/delta (PPAR alpha/delta) are regarded as potential therapeutic targets for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, PPAR alpha/delta dual agonist GFT-505 exhibited poor anti-NASH effects in a phase III clinical trial, probably due to its weak PPAR alpha/delta agonistic activity and poor metabolic stability. Other reported PPAR alpha/delta dual agonists either exhibited limited potency or had unbalanced PPAR alpha/delta agonistic activity. Herein, we report a series of novel triazolone derivatives as PPAR alpha/delta dual agonists. Among them, compound H11 exhibited potent and well-balanced PPAR alpha/delta agonistic activity (PPAR alpha EC50 = 7.0 nM; PPAR delta EC50 = 8.4 and a high selectivity over PPAR gamma (PPAR gamma EC50 = 1316.1 nM) in PPAR transactivation assays. The crystal structure of PPAR6 in complex with H11 revealed a unique PPAR delta-agonist interaction. H11, which had excellent PK properties and a good safety profile, showed potent in vivo anti-NASH effects in preclinical models. Together, H11 holds a great promise for treating NASH or other inflammatory and fibrotic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据