4.7 Article

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Potent, Selective, and Bioavailable AKT Kinase Degraders

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 24, 页码 18054-18081

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01476

关键词

-

资金

  1. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R35CA220491]
  3. NCI at the NIH [P30CA196521]
  4. Leo and Julia Forchheimer Foundation Postdoc Fellowship
  5. National Institutes of Health SIG grants [1S10OD025132, 1S10OD028504]
  6. T32 postdoc fellow training grant [T32CA078207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AKT, a critical node in the PI3K/AKT/m-TOR signaling pathway, is strongly correlated with cancer. Two novel and potent AKT degraders were identified, showing the ability to induce AKT protein degradation and inhibit cancer cell proliferation.
The serine/threonine kinase AKT functions as a critical node of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR)signaling pathway. Aberrant activation and overexpression of AKT are strongly correlated with numerous human cancers. To date, only two AKT degraders with no structure & minus;activityrelationship (SAR) results have been reported. Through extensive SAR studies on variouslinkers, E3 ligase ligands, and AKT binding moieties, we identified two novel and potentAKT proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) degraders: von Hippel & minus;Lindau (VHL)-recruiting degrader13(MS98) and cereblon (CRBN)-recruiting degrader25(MS170).These two compounds selectively induced robust AKT protein degradation, inhibiteddownstream signaling, and suppressed cancer cell proliferation. Moreover, these twodegraders exhibited good plasma exposure levels in mice through intraperitoneal injection. Overall, our comprehensive SAR studies led to the discovery of degraders13and25, which are potentially useful chemical tools to investigate biological and pathogenic functions of AKT in vitro and in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据