4.6 Article

Preparation and magnetic performance optimization of FeSiAl/Al2O3-MnO-Al2O3 soft magnetic composites with particle size adjustment

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-07355-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Graduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund of Wuhan University of Science and Technology [JCX202006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674181]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1908085QE190]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By regulating the average particle size of FeSiAl powders, the electromagnetic performance of FeSiAl soft magnetic composites can be optimized. A decrease in the average thickness of the MnO2 coating and the relative density of the composites leads to weakened permeability, deteriorated coercivity, increased hysteresis loss, and slightly enhanced saturation magnetization. Smaller particle sizes result in increased resistivity and a reduction in both inter-particle and intra-particle eddy current losses.
FeSiAl soft magnetic composites (SMCs) with unique three-shell structured Al2O3-MnO-Al2O3 composite coatings were designed and prepared via sintering ball milled FeSiAl/MnO2 core-shell structured composite powders. The electromagnetic performance of the FeSiAl SMCs was optimized by regulating the average particle size of FeSiAl powders systematically. Owing to the interfacial reaction between MnO2 coating and Al with high reactivity from the FeSiAl alloy cores, the composite coatings were formed. When the average particle size decreased from 144 to15 mu m, both the average thickness of the MnO2 coating and the relative density of the FeSiAl SMCs were decreased, resulting in the weakened permeability and deteriorated coercivity as well as the increased hysteresis loss, but the saturation magnetization showed a slight enhancement. And the resistivity was increased when the average particle size was smaller, which led to the obvious reduction of both the inter-particle and intra-particle eddy current losses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据