4.6 Article

Compositional variation of dielectric and magnetic parameters in Ni0.5MgxZn0.5-xFe2O4 spinel ferrites

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-07755-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. DCRUST, Murthal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ferrite samples Ni0.5MgxZn0.5-xFe2O4; (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) were synthesized using a conventional solid-state reaction procedure. Various analyses were performed to study their microstructure, chemical composition, dielectric properties, and AC conductivity, revealing important relationships such as the decrease in saturation magnetization with increasing Mg content and the frequency-dependent behavior of dielectric properties. These ferrites show potential applications in memory devices and transformer core materials.
The ferrite samples Ni0.5MgxZn0.5-xFe2O4; (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have been synthesized through conventional solid-state reaction procedure. Williamson-Hall Plots suggests micro-strain decreases with increasing Mg content. Microstructure and chemical composition have been studied using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (FESEM-EDX). Dielectric studies have been performed up to 400 degrees C temperature in the frequency range of 100 Hz to 1 MHz. Dielectric constant as well as tangent loss has been showed dispersive behavior at low frequency region whereas nearly constant behavior at high frequency region. AC conductivity is found to have increasing trend as the frequency increases. The high value of dielectric constant at lower frequencies was possibly due the space charge polarization. The Nyquist plot of impedance shows semi-circular arcs having center lying below the real axis and the radius decreased as temperature increased. Jonscher's power law (JPL) Fitting has been used to calculate frequency exponent parameter. Saturation magnetization is found to decrease with increasing content of Mg. These ferrites have potent utility in memory devices and transformer core materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据