4.7 Article

Carbon fibers@Co-ZIFs derivations composites as highly efficient electromagnetic wave absorbers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 239-246

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.072

关键词

Carbon fibers; MOFs; Magnetic metal; Electromagnetic wave absorption; Radar cross section

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971111, 22005148]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200766]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By preparing carbon fibers@Co-ZIFs derivations as advanced EM wave absorbing materials and optimizing the interface for maximum reflection loss, electromagnetic wave interference pollution can be effectively reduced. Additionally, absorbing composite coatings designed using simulation methods can effectively reduce radar reflection signals, providing a reference for preparing absorbing materials and designing coatings.
To reduce electromagnetic (EM) wave interference pollution, in this work, carbon fibers@Co-ZIFs derivations (CFZD) as an advanced EM wave absorbing material was successfully prepared. The yolk-shell structure of the magnetic metal particles generated a large amount of contact area, facilitating the interface polarization and relaxation. As a result, the optimized sample delivers a maximum reflection loss (RL) value of -19.2 dB with a bandwidth of 2.6 GHz at a small thickness of 1.3 mm. Additionally, ANSYS Electronics Desktop 2018 (HFSS) was used to simulate the radar cross section (RCS) reduction in practical application based on these composites. The RCS values of composite coatings are less than -10 dB m(2) at the range of -90 degrees < theta<90 degrees, which indicate the effective reduction of the radar reflection signal by the composite coatings. The work is of reference significance for preparing great absorbing materials and designing absorbing coatings by combining simulation method. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Chinese Society for Metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据