4.6 Article

Structure-performance correlations in the hybrid oxide-supported copper-zinc SAPO-34 catalysts for direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from CO2

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 3268-3279

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-06890-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union (Electron to Value-Added Chemicals (E2C) Interreg 2 Seas Project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that copper dispersion was higher and CO2 conversion rate was greater on alumina and zirconia supported catalysts, followed by ceria supported catalysts. The CO2 hydrogenation process appears to be mainly influenced by the higher copper dispersion and to a lesser extent by the concentration of Bronsted acid sites in the catalysts studied. Due to lower reverse water gas-shift activity, the alumina supported catalyst showed a higher dimethyl ether yield compared to the zirconia and ceria supported catalysts.
Growing CO2 emissions lead to global warming, which is currently one of the most challenging environmental phenomena. Direct catalytic hydrogenation to dimethyl ether over hybrid catalysts enables CO2 utilization, hydrogen and energy storage and produces sustainable fuels and an important platform molecule. In this paper, we evaluated structure-performance correlations in the bifunctional hybrid copper-zinc SAPO-34 catalysts for direct synthesis of dimethyl ether via CO2 prepared using zirconia, alumina and ceria used as oxide carriers. Higher copper dispersion and higher CO2 conversion rate were uncovered over the alumina and zirconia supported catalysts followed by ceria supported counterpart. The CO2 hydrogenation seems to be principally favoured by higher copper dispersion and to a lesser extent depends on the concentration of Bronsted acid sites in the studied catalysts. Because of lower reverse water gas-shift activity, the alumina supported catalyst exhibited a higher dimethyl ether yield compared to the zirconia and ceria supported counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据