4.6 Article

Effect of calcination temperature on electrochemical performance of niobium oxides/carbon composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 18, 页码 8504-8515

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-06931-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports, Czech Republic INTER-EXCELLENCE program [LTT20005, RP/CPS/2020/005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, niobium oxides/carbon composites were prepared by calcining a niobium peroxo-PAA complex (NbPAA) precursor to improve the electric conductivity of Orthorhombic niobium pentoxide (T-Nb2O5). It was found that the calcination temperature played a crucial role in determining the chemical compositions of the obtained composites. At a medium temperature of 900 degrees C, the sample consisted of T-Nb2O5, monoclinic Nb2O5 (M-Nb2O5), amorphous carbon, and niobium dioxide (NbO2), exhibiting a good specific capacity and high-rate performance.
Orthorhombic niobium pentoxide (T-Nb2O5) possesses an intercalation pseudocapacitive behavior, which is a promising candidate of high-rate anodes for Li-ion capacitors. However, its low electric conductivity hinders the realization of this property. In our study, niobium oxides/carbon composites were prepared by calcinating a niobium peroxo-PAA complex (NbPAA) precursor to improve the electric conductivity. It has been found that the calcination temperature played an important role on the chemical compositions of obtained composites. A reduction phenomenon of niobium oxides by carbon was observed at high temperatures. At the medium temperature of 900 degrees C, the sample was composed of T-Nb2O5, monoclinic Nb2O5 (M-Nb2O5), amorphous carbon and niobium dioxide (NbO2). Due to the high conductivity of carbon, semi-conductivity of NbO2, and high specific capacity of M-Nb2O5, this sample exhibits a good specific capacity of 142 mAh g(-1) (0.25 C) and a high-rate capability (capacity retention of 33.1%, 0.25 C to 25 C). It could be used as one of high-rate anodes for Li-ion capacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据