4.6 Article

The effect of textured surface on graphene wettability and droplet evaporation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 1850-1862

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-06853-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of grain orientation and textured surfaces on droplet evaporation and the wettability of graphene coatings. The results show that on a heated textured graphene substrate, a jump in the contact line of the water droplet is observed in the final stage of evaporation, resulting in an abrupt increase in the contact angle by almost two times. Molecular-dynamic modeling reveals that wettability depends on grain orientation and annealing duration.
The influence of a grain orientation and textured surfaces on the droplet evaporation and the graphene coating wettability is investigated. The study of the behavior of water droplets on graphene-coated substrates is important for the development of highly sensitive sensor technologies. The coating of the graphene layer with water leads to changes in charge concentration and electrical conductivity. To date, there are very few studies on the effect of substrate textures and wall heating on water droplets evaporation on a heated graphene coating. The contact angle depends on the ratio of several factors: textures, grain orientation and grain size. In the final stage of evaporation of a water droplet on a hot textured substrate with graphene, a jump in the contact line of the water droplet is observed. The contact angle abruptly increases almost two times. Molecular-dynamic modeling has shown that the wettability depends on the grains orientation and the annealing duration. The measured experimental value of the copper contact angle of 74-76 degrees after annealing corresponds to the simulation results considering the direct proportionality between the contact angle and the amplitude of the first maximum of the density distributions of water molecules in the vicinity of a smooth copper surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据