4.5 Article

Optimization of Electrochemical Performance for Activated Carbon and Functionalized Graphene Composite-Based Supercapacitor

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-06598-7

关键词

activated carbon; compatibility; functionalized reduced graphene oxide; reduced graphene oxide; supercapacitor; wettability

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) - Korea government(MSIT) [2019R1F1A1059469]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1F1A1059469] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the ratio of activated carbon (AC) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was optimized to fabricate the F-rGO/AC-15 composite, which exhibited low charge transfer resistance and high energy density for supercapacitor application.
In this paper, we optimize the ratio of activated carbon (AC) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to fabricate their composite to improve the electrochemical performances of the rGO/AC composite-based supercapacitor. In addition, the rGO is functionalized by using an ionic liquid (F-rGO) as 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIBF4) to enhance wettability and compatibility between electrode and electrolyte. The electrochemical performances of F-rGO and AC (F-rGO/AC-15) composite-based supercapacitor are evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and galvanostatic charge/discharge tests (GCD). The F-rGO/AC-15 composite (15:85, w/w %)-based supercapacitor indicates low charge transfer resistance (0.41 omega) when compares to the rGO/AC-15 composite-based supercapacitor (0.6 omega). In addition, F-rGO/AC-15 composite-based supercapacitor shows high energy density of 146 Wh kg(-1), while pristine AC-based supercapacitor showed energy density of 50.1 Wh kg(-1) with 416.6 W kg(-1) of power density. The F-rGO/AC-15 composite-based supercapacitor also shows the enhanced specific capacitance of 127 F g(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据