4.7 Review

Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery in Neuroimaging: A Narrative Review on Clinical Applications and Technical Advances

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 341-353

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28117

关键词

contrast-enhanced-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; Meniere's disease; stroke; traumatic brain injury; brain metastasis; glymphatic dysfunction

资金

  1. Yonsei University College of Medicine [6-2019-0050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contrast-enhanced FLAIR, traditionally used to evaluate leptomeningeal disease, is now being explored for various other pathologies. However, the exact mechanism for its high sensitivity to low concentrations of gadolinium remains unclear, and challenges exist in its accurate application due to unoptimized parameters in clinical practice.
While contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) has long been regarded as an adjunct sequence to evaluate leptomeningeal disease in addition to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, it is gradually being used for more diverse pathologies beyond leptomeningeal disease. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR is known to be highly sensitive to low concentrations of gadolinium within the fluid. Accordingly, recent research has suggested the potential utility of contrast-enhanced FLAIR in various kinds of disease, such as Meniere's disease, seizure, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and brain metastasis, in addition to being used for visualizing glymphatic dysfunction. However, its potential applications have been reported sporadically in an unorganized manner. Furthermore, the exact mechanism for its superior sensitivity to low concentrations of gadolinium has not been fully understood. Rapidly developing magnetic resonance technology and unoptimized parameters for FLAIR may challenge its accurate application in clinical practice. This review provides the fundamental mechanism of contrast-enhanced FLAIR, systematically describes its current and potential clinical application, and elaborates on technical considerations for its optimization. Level of Evidence 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 5

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据