4.7 Article

Intracranial Blood Flow Quantification by Accelerated Dual-venc 4D Flow MRI: Comparison With Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 1256-1264

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28115

关键词

transcranial Doppler ultrasound; 4D flow MRI; cerebrovascular hemodynamics; healthy subjects

资金

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01NS085002]
  2. National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01HL149787]
  3. Ruth L. Kirchstein National Research Service Award [NIH F30 HL140910]
  4. Northwestern Medical Science Training Program [NIH T32 GM815229]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  6. University of Alabama at Birmingham [HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201800007I]
  7. Northwestern University [HHSN268201800003I]
  8. University of Minnesota [HHSN268201800006I]
  9. Kaiser Foundation Research Institute [HHSN268201800004I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to compare cerebral blood flow velocity measures derived from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD. The results showed excellent interobserver agreement in dual-venc 4D flow MRI-based measurements of peak velocity, with a slight underestimation compared to TCD.
Background Dual-venc 4D flow MRI, recently introduced for the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics, may provide a promising complementary approach to well-established tools such as transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and overcome some of their disadvantages. However, data comparing intracranial flow measures from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD are lacking. Purpose To compare cerebral blood flow velocity measures derived from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD. Study Type Prospective cohort. Subjects A total of 25 healthy participants (56 +/- 4 years old, 44% female). Field Strength/Sequence A 3 T/dual-venc 4D flow MRI using a time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast sequence with three-dimensional velocity encoding. Assessment Peak velocity measurements in bilateral middle cerebral arteries (MCA) were quantified from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD. The MRI data were quantified by two independent observers (S.M and Y.M.) and TCD was performed by a trained technician (A.L.M.). We assessed the agreement between 4D flow MRI and TCD measures, and the interobserver agreement of 4D flow MRI measurements. Statistical Tests Peak velocity from MRI and TCD was compared using Bland-Altman analysis and coefficient of variance. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess MRI interobserver agreement. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There was excellent interobserver agreement in dual-venc 4D flow MRI-based measurements of peak velocity in bilateral MCA (ICC = 0.97 and 0.96 for the left and right MCA, respectively). Dual-venc 4D flow MRI significantly underestimated peak velocity in the left and right MCA compared to TCD (bias = 0.13 [0.59, -0.33] m/sec and 0.15 [0.47, -0.17] m/sec, respectively). The coefficient of variance between dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD measurements was 26% for the left MCA and 22% for the right MCA. Data Conclusion There was excellent interobserver agreement for the assessment of MCA peak velocity using dual-venc 4D flow MRI, and <= 20% under-estimation compared with TCD. Evidence Level 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据