4.3 Article

NMR characterization of H2O2 hydrogen exchange

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
卷 333, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.107092

关键词

CEST; Hydrogen peroxide; Biological fluid; Hydrogen exchange; sensitivity-enhanced NMR; pH dependence

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study optimized NMR detection for direct quantification of H2O2 in aqueous solutions down to the nanomolar range, achieving high sensitivity through fast hydrogen exchange. The specific acid-, base-, and water-catalyzed HX rates were measured, with optimal conditions for accurate measurement of H2O2 concentrations as low as 40 nM in aqueous samples established.
Quantification of H2O2 concentration in aqueous solutions is of interest in many fields. It usually is based on indirect methods that rely on oxidation reactions that turn on/off fluorescent probes. Such methods can suffer from reaction incompleteness and interfering chemical species. We describe optimization of NMR detection that enables direct quantification of H2O2 down to the nanomolar range. Taking advantage of fast hydrogen exchange (HX) between H2O2 and water permits the use of very short interscan delays, greatly increasing sensitivity. The specific acid-, base- and water-catalyzed HX rates at 2 degrees C were measured to be 2.1 x 10(7), 6.1 x 10(9), and 1.4 x 10(-1) M-1 s(-1), respectively, which result in a minimum HX rate at pH 6.2. Furthermore, the exchange is accelerated by general acid/base catalysis. MES and phosphate buffers catalyze HX strongest in their unprotonated forms. For imidazole, only the unprotonated form catalyzes HX, which contrasts with acetic acid where only the protonated state catalyzes exchange. Inorganic salts such as sodium chloride and azide have negligible effect on HX. We present optimal conditions for accurate measurement of H2O2 concentrations as low as 40 nM in aqueous samples in a few hours. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据