4.6 Article

Effect of thickness on the electronic structure and optical properties of quasi two-dimensional perovskite CsPbBr3 nanoplatelets

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118392

关键词

CsPbBr3; Nanoplatelets; k.p

类别

资金

  1. Singapore MOE AcRF [Tier 1 RG87/17]
  2. MOE [T2EP50120-0003]
  3. AStar [1720700038]
  4. [NRF-CRP19-2017-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research investigated the effect of the thickness of cesium lead halide perovskite CsPbBr3 nanoplatelets on their electronic structure and optical properties. It was found that as the thickness decreases, the bandgap increases and the band mixing becomes more significant, influencing the transition matrix element. Experimental and theoretical calculations showed that with an increase in injected carrier density, the maximum optical gain of thicker nanoplatelets saturates faster than thinner ones.
The effect of thickness of cesium lead halide perovskite CsPbBr3 nanoplatelets (NPLs) on their electronic structure and optical properties are investigated using an effective-mass envelope function theory based on the 8band k.p model with the consideration of exciton binding energy. We first reported the CsPbBr3 nanoplatelets' band structure and optical gain with exciton effect. As the thickness of NPLs decreases, their bandgap increases and the band mixing is more obvious which influences the transition matrix element (TME). The optical gain of CsPbBr3 nanoplatelets is calculated by taking into account of TME, Fermi factor, injected carrier density and thickness. A blue shift of peak position in optical gain can be observed as the thickness of NPLs decreases. As the injected carrier density arises, the maximum optical gain of thicker NPLs reach saturation much faster than the thinner ones. To obtain high differential gain, NPLs with less thickness are better choices. Experimental work is carried out and the results agree with our theoretical results very well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据