4.7 Article

Highly Sensitive Integrated Photonic Sensor and Interrogator Using Cascaded Silicon Microring Resonators

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 3055-3061

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3145501

关键词

Integrated interrogators; microring resonators; photonic sensing; silicon photonics.

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB1802903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon photonic sensors offer advantages of high-performance, compactness, and large-scale integration. However, the interrogation systems for these sensors are still bulky and inflexible for portable applications. This paper proposes a monolithic silicon refractive index sensor and interrogator using cascaded microring resonators, with a novel dithering and bias scan interrogation technique for highly sensitive sensing. Experimental results verify the sensitivity and accuracy of the sensor system.
Silicon photonic sensors have formed a favorable platform for various sensing applications due to the great advantages of high-performance, compactness, and large-scale integration capability. However, interrogation systems for reading out the encoded sensing information from an integrated sensor are still bulky and inflexible for various portable applications. In this paper, we propose a monolithic silicon refractive index sensor and interrogator by utilizing the cascaded microring resonators. A novel dithering and bias scan interrogation technique is designed for highly sensitive refractive index sensing with a broadband light source. The reflective index for aqueous solutions of ethanol with different concentrations are measured in the experiment, verifying that the sensitivity of the sensor is 125.1 nm/RIU and the detection accuracy of the whole system is 7.76x10(-6) RIU. This integrated photonic sensor and interrogator will be a promising solution for large-scale applications in biological and chemical sensing scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据