4.1 Article

Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the IPECC-SET 9 item version

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 900-907

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2034762

关键词

Collaborative practice; interprofessional competence; interprofessional education; Rasch model; self-efficacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study translated and validated the Swedish version of IPECC-SET 9, demonstrating its sound psychometric properties and potential for measuring self-efficacy in interprofessional collaborative practice among health profession students. Further testing in larger samples representing health-care teams is recommended.
Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential to prepare future health-care professionals for collaborative practice, but IPE requires evaluation. One psychometrically sound instrument is the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competence Self-Efficacy Tool consisting of nine items (IPECC-SET 9). This tool does not, to date, exist in a Swedish version. Therefore, the aim of this study was to translate and validate the Swedish version of the IPECC-SET 9. The English version was translated into Swedish and tested among 159 students in the 3-year Bachelor Programs in Nursing and in Biomedical Laboratory Science. The psychometric analysis was guided by a Rasch model, which showed that the items functioned well together, confirming unidimensionality, and that the person misfit was also lower than the set criterion. The separation index was 2.98, and the Rasch-equivalent Cronbach-alpha measure was estimated to .92, supporting internal consistency. No systematic differences on item level in IPECC-SET 9 further supported fairness in testing. The Swedish IPECC-SET 9 demonstrates sound psychometric properties and has the potential to be used as a measure of self-efficacy for competence in interprofessional collaborative practice among health profession students. However, the IPECC-SET 9 is recommended to be further tested in larger samples representing the entirety of health-care teams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据