4.4 Article

Effect of operating parameters on functional fatigue characteristics of an Ni-Ti shape memory alloy on partial thermomechanical cycling

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X211072233

关键词

NiTi SMAs; thermomechanical cycling; phase transformation; fatigue; upper cycle temperature

资金

  1. Scientific and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, India [CRG/2019/002267]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of upper cycle temperature and applied stress on the functional properties of an SMA during partial thermomechanical cycling. The results show that decreasing the upper cycle temperature and stress level can improve the stability and lifespan of SMAs.
In this study, the influence of upper cycle temperature (maximum temperature in a cycle) and the magnitude of applied stress on the functional properties of an SMA during partial thermomechanical cycling has been studied. A near-equiatomic NiTi SMA was chosen and tested under different upper cycle temperatures (between martensite finish (M-f) and austenite finish (A(f)) temperatures) and stress level (below and above the yield strength of the martensite). The upper cycle temperature was varied by controlling the magnitude of the current supply. The results show that a raise in the upper cycle temperature causes the permanent strain to increase and also lowers the stability. However, decreasing the stress imposed to a value lower than the yield strength of the martensite improves cyclic stability. The upper cycle temperature was found to influence the crack nucleation, whereas the applied stress level the crack propagation during partial thermomechanical cycling of SMAs. Therefore, decreasing the upper cycle temperature as well as the magnitude of stress applied to lower than the yield stress of martensite have been found to be suitable strategies for increasing the lifespan of SMA-based actuators during partial thermomechanical cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据